Rencana
Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional (RPJMN 2010‐2014)
The National Medium Term Development Plan (RPJMN, 2010‐2014)
is the second phase of implementation of Indonesia's National
Long Term Development Plan (RPJPN 2005‐2025) promulgated through Law
17/2007. The RPJMN 2010‐2014 forms the basis for ministries and government
agencies when formulating their respective Strategic Plans (Renstra‐KL).
Regional governments also must take this medium term plan into account when
formulating or adjusting their respective regional development plans. For the
implementation of the National Long Term Development Plan, the RPJMN is to be
further elaborated into the Annual Government Work Plan (RKP) that will then
become the basis for formulating the Draft Government Budget (RAPBN).
Indonesia is in the midst of carving out a new history in
order to continue growth and progress. The common ideal of the Indonesian
people is to become a grand and advanced nation; a nation that is prosperous,
self‐ reliant, democratic and just. More than a decade after the Indonesian
people decided to pursue a new path in history - and after being adversely
affected by a multidimensional
crisis - the country has managed to develop again.
Investment Requirements and Policies on National Development Fund and Utilization
In the context of attaining the development targets, the
investment funding policies are directed to ensuring the availability and
optimizing of development funds towards development funding self‐reliance. In
this regard, the main strategies of development funding are: (1) optimizing of
the sources and schemes of existing as well as future development funds, and
(2) increasing the quality of development funding sources and schemes.
Total investment of Rp. 11,913.2 - Rp. 12,462.6 trillion
cumulative for five years is needed to attain the average economic growth
target of 6.3 ‐ 6.8 percent per year. Out of this total investment required,
around 18 percent in 2014 is expected to be provided by the government.
Government funding is obtained from tax revenues and non‐tax revenues,
originating from grants, foreign financing, and from domestic financing. The
remaining investment requirement can be obtained from the business community
and from banks, non‐bank financial institutions, capital market (stocks and
bonds), foreign funds, retained earnings, and others. The increase in the
proportion of investment funds from the business community mainly comes from
the PMA (Foreign Direct Investment) and PMDN (Domestic Direct Investment) in
line with the more conducive business climate, from the increased capital
market in line with the improved regulatory framework and strengthened
management of the capital market, and from the increased governance and
performance of companies.
In the context of increasing government revenues, the
government will continue to develop and improve policies on tax revenues and
non‐tax revenues, while still maintaining a conducive investment climate.
Meanwhile, for increasing the effectiveness of government expenditures, the
following measures are taken:
• Increasing expenditures quality by consolidating the implementation of the MTEF (Medium‐Term Expenditure Framework) and performance based budgeting, through restructuring programs and activities, and formulating accurate and measurable performance indicators.
• Increasing and strengthening planning and budgeting that links the central government through improvements in the RPJMN (National Medium‐Term Development Plan) formulation, Renstra (Strategic Plans of Ministries), RKP (Government Annual Work Plan), RKA‐KL (Budget Allocation Plan of Ministries and Government Agencies), and other instruments. Likewise, the regional governments will improve the formulation of the RPJMD (Regional Medium‐Term Development Plan), Budget Work Plan of Regional Governments, and other policy instruments.
• Formulating more effective budget allocations in attaining targets and placing funding priorities to activities that can multiply domestic economic activities and can create a large number of employment opportunities and support efforts in enhancing public services quality.
• Strengthening monitoring and evaluation in the planning, implementation, and budgeting process.
• Improving the mechanisms for budget administration and budget disbursement into a faster and more accountable one.
• Increasing expenditures quality by consolidating the implementation of the MTEF (Medium‐Term Expenditure Framework) and performance based budgeting, through restructuring programs and activities, and formulating accurate and measurable performance indicators.
• Increasing and strengthening planning and budgeting that links the central government through improvements in the RPJMN (National Medium‐Term Development Plan) formulation, Renstra (Strategic Plans of Ministries), RKP (Government Annual Work Plan), RKA‐KL (Budget Allocation Plan of Ministries and Government Agencies), and other instruments. Likewise, the regional governments will improve the formulation of the RPJMD (Regional Medium‐Term Development Plan), Budget Work Plan of Regional Governments, and other policy instruments.
• Formulating more effective budget allocations in attaining targets and placing funding priorities to activities that can multiply domestic economic activities and can create a large number of employment opportunities and support efforts in enhancing public services quality.
• Strengthening monitoring and evaluation in the planning, implementation, and budgeting process.
• Improving the mechanisms for budget administration and budget disbursement into a faster and more accountable one.
The funding procurement from foreign sources, in the form of
foreign grants as well as loans (PHLN), must place the importance on
Indonesia’s sovereignty, national interest and should increase effectiveness of
their utilization in accordance with the national development priorities.
Utilization of the PHLN must be viewed not only from the funding point of view,
but also as the means for exchanging information and experience in the context
of strengthening and improving the national system of planning, budgeting,
procurement, monitoring and evaluation and for strengthening the institutional
capacity and human resources.
Funding sources through foreign grants can originate from
international development partners, countries as well as international
institutions and bodies. Even though as a proportion of total government
revenues grants are small, it does not entail the risk of having to be repaid.
In the context of optimizing the use of grants, the government will continue to
enhance the capacity of grant receiving institutions and improve the
implementing regulations on government grants management that are more conducive
and flexible while still accountable, that can be adjusted to the
characteristics of the grant.
Funding sources from foreign loans can be in the form of
program loans as well as project loans that originate from multilateral,
bilateral, and commercial financial institutions. In view of the increased
status of Indonesia as a Middle Lower Income Country (MLIC), Indonesia will no
longer be eligible for obtaining very low cost loans from multilateral
financial institutions. Therefore, it is necessary that the management of
foreign loans is strengthened and their utilization is increasingly optimized.
To reduce the government debt burden, the ratio of
government debt will continuously be reduced to 24 percent in 2014, while still
maintaining the negative net transfer target. Government debt management will
continue to enhance, by increasing the effectiveness of portfolio management,
diversification of debt sources, development of safer debt funding schemes, and
by risk management of government debt.
In order to increase the utilization of foreign loans and
grants quality, steps are taken for:
(i) revising the regulations on the planning and management of the government PHLN (Government Regulation Number 2/2006 on the Procedure for the Loans Procurement and/or Receiving Grants and Forwarding Foreign Loans and/or Grants, and Regulation of the Minister of National Development Planning Number 05 /2006 on Procedure of Planning and Submitting of Proposal and Evaluation of Activities that are Financed from Foreign Loans and/or Grants,
(ii) increasing the quality of planning and capacity for implementation of projects such as through enforcing regulations on project preparedness, sharpening focus in the utilization of the PHLN so as to become more selective for the financing or supporting national priority programs/activities,
(iii) increasing the use of the national system (alignment) and harmonizing development partners’ activities,
(iv) strengthening quality of monitoring and evaluation. The government will continue to increase effectiveness of foreign loans and grants utilization (PHLN) together with development partners by consistently implementing the agenda of the Paris Declaration, that has been further elaborated in the Jakarta Commitment.
(i) revising the regulations on the planning and management of the government PHLN (Government Regulation Number 2/2006 on the Procedure for the Loans Procurement and/or Receiving Grants and Forwarding Foreign Loans and/or Grants, and Regulation of the Minister of National Development Planning Number 05 /2006 on Procedure of Planning and Submitting of Proposal and Evaluation of Activities that are Financed from Foreign Loans and/or Grants,
(ii) increasing the quality of planning and capacity for implementation of projects such as through enforcing regulations on project preparedness, sharpening focus in the utilization of the PHLN so as to become more selective for the financing or supporting national priority programs/activities,
(iii) increasing the use of the national system (alignment) and harmonizing development partners’ activities,
(iv) strengthening quality of monitoring and evaluation. The government will continue to increase effectiveness of foreign loans and grants utilization (PHLN) together with development partners by consistently implementing the agenda of the Paris Declaration, that has been further elaborated in the Jakarta Commitment.
Government domestic financing is obtained from banking and
non‐banking financing. The important role is that of non‐banking financing,
particularly the SBN (Government Securities), the SBSN (State Syariah
Securities), and domestic borrowings. The SBN/SBSN are widely sold to financial
institutions as well as to the public. To increase efficiency and effectiveness
in the management of the SBN/SBSN portfolio, efforts are continued for
developing new instruments, strengthening the infrastructure, and coordinating
its management.
Domestic loans are obtained through funds from state‐owned
banks, domestic private banks, and regional governments. Government financing
from domestic debt is not to hamper credit absorption by private sector and is
mainly aimed for reducing dependence on foreign commercial loans. In that
effort, government policies are prioritized at improving the laws and
regulations and at strengthening the capacity of institutions that are related
to the procurement of domestic loans. This is directed at strengthening the
mechanism for coordinating institutions in the utilization of loans, regarding
their planning, implementation, as well as their monitoring and evaluation.
As funding intermediation institutions, banks have an
important role in supplying investment funds from public savings. Funding from
banks can be through the conventional scheme. In addition, it can also be
channeled through non‐bank institutions, such as: financing institutions
including infrastructure financing institutions and export financing
institutions, insurance institutions, pension fund institutions, mortgage
institutions, and capital markets. The potential of these financial
institutions need to be directed to the financing of the real sector for
stimulating investments. For this purpose, efforts are continued in improving
the regulations and policies to support the roles of banks, non‐banks, and the
capital market as sources of medium‐term and long‐term funding.
In addition to being the provider of national development
funds, the PMDN/PMA (Domestic and Foreign Direct Investment) has an important
role as business entities in national development. To increase the PMDN/PMA,
the strategy is to improve policies to attain a more conducive investment
climate and provide reliable and adequate infrastructure.
The prospective in increasing the national development
funding sources can also be made by encouraging and developing development
schemes that involve government roles and contributions, business community,
and public. Some of the funding schemes that can be utilized are: (i) Public
Private Partnership (PPP) scheme; (ii) Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR);
and (iii) Donations/Zakat.
The Role of Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) in National Economic Development
The ability of private companies to reduce costs, shorten
the procurement period, and manage constructions and facilities more
efficiently, have made PPPs capable offering value for money compared to the
construction of the same facilities that are managed by the government. To increase
the utilization of the PPP scheme, two main steps are carried out, namely
optimizing the PPP scheme and increasing the quality of utilizing the PPP
scheme.
The steps for optimizing the PPP scheme are made through the
following:
• Developing, revising, and harmonizing various sectors as well as regional policies and regulations, for facilitating formation of the PPP, particularly revision of Presidential Regulation Number 67 year 2005 and regulations on the land procurement for construction of public infrastructure.
• Developing laws and regulations for expanding the PPP priority fields other than infrastructure.
Steps for increasing effectiveness of the utilization of the PPP scheme are through the following:
• Compiling the PPP book, that contains the list of government projects that can be implemented through cooperation with private companies at the beginning of each year, according to the government work plan cycle. According to Presidential Instruction Number 5 of 2008, the PPP book is compiled and issued as an effort to create a mechanism for preparing projects that is more integrated with the government budget cycle, transparent and accountable. To optimize private participation in development, it is necessary that the plan for preparing government projects that will be implemented in cooperation with private companies is integrated with the government work plan to subsequently be implemented by ministries and government agencies and by regional government agencies.
• Strengthening the role of the PPP institution for enhancing efficiency in PPP implementation management in compiling the planning strategy and sector priority that will be implemented in cooperation with private companies.
• Developing, revising, and harmonizing various sectors as well as regional policies and regulations, for facilitating formation of the PPP, particularly revision of Presidential Regulation Number 67 year 2005 and regulations on the land procurement for construction of public infrastructure.
• Developing laws and regulations for expanding the PPP priority fields other than infrastructure.
Steps for increasing effectiveness of the utilization of the PPP scheme are through the following:
• Compiling the PPP book, that contains the list of government projects that can be implemented through cooperation with private companies at the beginning of each year, according to the government work plan cycle. According to Presidential Instruction Number 5 of 2008, the PPP book is compiled and issued as an effort to create a mechanism for preparing projects that is more integrated with the government budget cycle, transparent and accountable. To optimize private participation in development, it is necessary that the plan for preparing government projects that will be implemented in cooperation with private companies is integrated with the government work plan to subsequently be implemented by ministries and government agencies and by regional government agencies.
• Strengthening the role of the PPP institution for enhancing efficiency in PPP implementation management in compiling the planning strategy and sector priority that will be implemented in cooperation with private companies.
Implementation of CSR by business units that operate in
Indonesia has been stipulated in Law Number 40 year 2007 on Limited
Corporations. The CSR is then more directed at increasing the consistency of
its activities with government programs in supporting national development,
including attaining the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), and efforts for
overcoming impacts of climate change. Considering the high potential of the CSR
for supporting national development, efforts need to be made to harmonize
policies of institutions, companies and government in the process of planning,
implementing, and reporting of activities.
Other development funding schemes that continue to develop
are instruments that are related to religious activities, such as zakat.
Several zakat managing entities have already started to develop zakat
management systems in a more professional manner and that also have the
potential for supporting government programs. In this regard, such funding
sources continue to be encouraged so that it can increase, among others through
the strengthening of institutions and management of funds based on religious
activities and improvement of its utilization in line with national
development.
In addition to the above funding schemes, there are global
schemes that have the potential of becoming national development funding
sources, such as Carbon Trade, the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), the
Copenhagen Green Climate Fund, and others. In the context of utilizing such
funding sources, attempts are made for developing and strengthening policies
and institutional capacity that can support the utilization of such funds.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar